TCLNX vs. TCIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX).
TCLNX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004. TCIEX is a passively managed fund by TIAA Investments that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund | -1.65% | 13.93% | 9.81% | 14.38% | -15.45% | 10.92% | 14.22% | 20.95% | -7.31% | 16.52% |
TCIEX TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class | 1.04% | 31.55% | 3.69% | 18.21% | -14.19% | 11.30% | 8.13% | 21.82% | -13.27% | 25.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLNX achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than TCIEX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLNX has underperformed TCIEX with an annualized return of 7.72%, while TCIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.
TCLNX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
TCIEX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLNX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TCIEX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCLNX vs. TCIEX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLNX
TCIEX
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLNX | TCIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.87 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.83 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 6.94 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLNX | TCIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.52 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLNX and TCIEX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Dividend Comparison
TCLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than TCIEX's 3.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund | 4.81% | 4.73% | 3.11% | 1.85% | 5.67% | 7.57% | 4.92% | 3.60% | 6.59% | 2.46% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
TCIEX TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class | 3.85% | 3.89% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.96% | 3.08% | 3.42% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 3.06% |
Drawdowns
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLNX drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, smaller than the maximum TCIEX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLNX and TCIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLNX | TCIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -59.27% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -11.35% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -29.25% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | -33.58% | +8.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -8.19% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -10.64% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.00% | -1.36% |
Volatility
TCLNX vs. TCIEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) is 3.72%, while TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that TCLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCLNX | TCIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 7.73% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.81% | 11.19% | -5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 17.19% | -7.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.81% | 15.94% | -6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 16.58% | -5.52% |