PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLIX vs. FRKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TCLIX having a 4.26% return and FRKMX slightly lower at 4.09%.


TCLIX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.48%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.82%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
6.22%

FRKMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.31%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TCLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund
4.26%11.50%7.52%10.90%-13.12%7.40%11.57%4.62%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
4.09%9.91%4.40%8.17%-11.57%2.88%8.68%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TCLIX and FRKMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.85

The correlation between TCLIX and FRKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCLIX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLIX
TCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FRKMX
FRKMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FRKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCLIXFRKMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.55

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

3.76

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.51

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.10

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.84

13.23

-0.39

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FRKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLIX and FRKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCLIXFRKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.55

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.80

-0.24

Drawdowns

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLIX and FRKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLIXFRKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-16.04%

-23.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-3.42%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-4.93%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-16.04%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-3.56%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.80%

+0.24%

Volatility

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) have volatilities of 1.75% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCLIXFRKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.67%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

3.42%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32%

4.15%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.95%

5.29%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.49%

5.14%

+2.35%

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCLIX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison

TCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than FRKMX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
3.20%3.11%3.12%2.92%4.66%3.65%2.56%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCLIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund
4.02%4.19%3.02%2.59%5.45%7.41%4.72%3.32%6.45%2.66%5.08%5.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TCLIX and FRKMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCLIX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FRKMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLIX dropped -39.84% vs FRKMX's -16.04%.

FRKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCLIX and FRKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer