TCLIX vs. FRBHX
TCLIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund) and FRBHX (Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, TCLIX returned 12.83% vs 31.41% for FRBHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCLIX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FRBHX.
Performance
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLIX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than FRBHX's 13.94% return.
TCLIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
FRBHX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TCLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund | 4.48% | 11.50% | 2.22% |
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 13.94% | 23.65% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLIX and FRBHX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TCLIX and FRBHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCLIX vs. FRBHX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLIX
FRBHX
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) and Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCLIX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 2.50 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.64 | 3.44 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.27 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 14.55 | -2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCLIX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.50 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.42 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than FRBHX's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLIX and FRBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLIX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -15.29% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -9.77% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -1.78% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 2.19% | -1.15% |
Volatility
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund (TCLIX) is 1.76%, while Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that TCLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCLIX | FRBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 4.24% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.28% | 10.50% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 12.78% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 15.80% | -8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 15.80% | -8.31% |
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FRBHX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCLIX vs. FRBHX - Dividend Comparison
TCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FRBHX's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 4.20% | 2.53% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2015 Fund | 4.01% | 4.19% | 3.02% | 2.59% | 5.45% | 7.41% | 4.72% | 3.32% | 6.45% | 2.66% | 5.08% | 5.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TCLIX and FRBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRBHX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to TCLIX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLIX dropped -39.84% vs FRBHX's -15.29%.
FRBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCLIX and FRBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer