PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCIEX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCIEX achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, TCIEX has underperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


TCIEX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.10%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.87%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.38%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
9.52%31.55%3.69%18.21%-14.19%11.30%8.13%21.82%-13.27%25.34%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TCIEX and RESGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.76

The correlation between TCIEX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCIEX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCIEX
TCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCIEXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.56

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

5.89

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

21.39

-14.33

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCIEX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCIEXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

3.21

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.71

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.72

-0.31

Drawdowns

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCIEX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCIEX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCIEXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-37.80%

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-7.84%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-20.50%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

-23.58%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

-37.80%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-5.00%

-5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.15%

+0.87%

Volatility

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) is 4.65%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that TCIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCIEXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

5.45%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

11.00%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

14.41%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.26%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

18.71%

-2.06%

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCIEX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCIEX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

TCIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
3.55%3.89%3.17%3.14%2.82%3.02%1.96%3.08%3.42%2.78%2.95%3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCIEX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to TCIEX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCIEX dropped -59.27% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCIEX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer