TCIEX vs. RCKSX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX).
TCIEX is a passively managed fund by TIAA Investments that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. RCKSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 31, 2004.
Performance
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCIEX TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class | 1.04% | 31.55% | 3.69% | 18.21% | -14.19% | 11.30% | 8.13% | 21.82% | -13.27% | 25.34% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 7.71% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 9.96% | 13.75% | 19.05% | -2.14% | 22.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCIEX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, TCIEX has underperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 8.90%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.38% annualized return.
TCIEX
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
RCKSX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCIEX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCIEX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
TCIEX
RCKSX
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCIEX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 2.06 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.09 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 10.93 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCIEX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCIEX and RCKSX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
TCIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than RCKSX's 5.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCIEX TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class | 3.85% | 3.89% | 3.17% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 3.02% | 1.96% | 3.08% | 3.42% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 3.06% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.81% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCIEX drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCIEX and RCKSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCIEX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -57.88% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -11.29% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | -23.50% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.58% | -33.10% | -0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.19% | -1.74% | -6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -9.58% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.16% | +0.84% |
Volatility
TCIEX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.72%. This indicates that TCIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCIEX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 3.72% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 8.88% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 16.40% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.78% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 17.59% | -1.01% |