TCAN vs. XRPZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TCAN (21Shares Canton Network ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. TCAN is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.

Performance

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TCAN

• 1D: -5.65%
• 1M: -19.39%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRPZ

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -10.04%
• 6M: -47.44%
• YTD: -40.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TCAN 21Shares Canton Network ETF	-10.10%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-23.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAN and XRPZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAN drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAN and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAN	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.34%	-55.39%	+31.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.35%	-52.60%	+31.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.21%	-33.91%	+24.70%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TCAN	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.57%	71.20%	-9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.57%	71.20%	-9.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.57%	71.20%	-9.63%

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAN vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCAN nor XRPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAN and XRPZ in my portfolio?

TCAN and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TCAN or XRPZ?

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAN or XRPZ?

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TCAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAN or XRPZ?

TCAN and XRPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TCAN and XRPZ?

They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TCAN and 0.19% for XRPZ.