TCAN vs. MNRS
TCAN (21Shares Canton Network ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Blockchain funds. TCAN is actively managed, while MNRS is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.
Performance
TCAN vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TCAN
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNRS
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -13.85%
- YTD
- 42.42%
- 6M
- 38.53%
- 1Y
- 78.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCAN vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TCAN 21Shares Canton Network ETF | -0.44% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAN and MNRS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAN vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank
TCAN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MNRS
TCAN vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Canton Network ETF (TCAN) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAN | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAN vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAN drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum MNRS drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAN and MNRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAN | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -56.70% | +42.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.90% | -21.50% | +8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -23.31% | +17.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.22% | — |
Volatility
TCAN vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAN | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.51% | 71.17% | -6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 70.59% | -6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.51% | 70.59% | -6.08% |
TCAN vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAN vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison
TCAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.38% | 0.54% |
TCAN 21Shares Canton Network ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAN and MNRS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TCAN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TCAN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MNRS.
MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for TCAN.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TCAN and 0.59% for MNRS.
Find the right allocation for TCAN and MNRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer