TBWIX vs. GSIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX).
TBWIX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Sep 30, 2015. GSIMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBWIX Thornburg Better World International Fund | -5.82% | 24.25% | 7.10% | 12.72% | -18.02% | 20.88% | 26.67% | 24.57% | -13.61% | 22.88% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.78% | 20.85% | 9.66% | 22.10% | -11.06% | 12.50% | 15.77% | 27.64% | -6.04% | 29.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBWIX achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.78% return.
TBWIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -12.01%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
GSIMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBWIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TBWIX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank
TBWIX
GSIMX
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBWIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 1.28 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.69 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.81 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 7.41 | -3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBWIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 1.28 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.73 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.81 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBWIX and GSIMX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison
TBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than GSIMX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBWIX Thornburg Better World International Fund | 1.62% | 1.53% | 1.40% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 15.10% | 0.40% | 1.17% | 10.14% | 3.53% | 5.99% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.93% | 5.12% | 11.18% | 2.36% | 4.89% | 2.23% | 0.18% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBWIX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBWIX and GSIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBWIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -28.84% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -8.75% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.11% | -25.37% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.01% | -6.12% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -4.85% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 2.15% | +0.81% |
Volatility
TBWIX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 4.78%. This indicates that TBWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBWIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 4.78% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 7.35% | +2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 12.47% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 14.42% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 15.77% | +1.00% |