TBLL vs. SPTU
TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - TBLL tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
TBLL vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBLL having a 1.43% return and SPTU slightly higher at 1.48%.
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBLL vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.43% | 0.91% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.48% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLL and SPTU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLL vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
TBLL
SPTU
TBLL vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 102.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 416.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3,533.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.26 | 11.82 | -7.56 |
Drawdowns
TBLL vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.04% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -0.00% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
TBLL vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 0.32% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 0.32% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 0.32% | +0.24% |
TBLL vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLL vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLL and SPTU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for TBLL and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer