PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLKX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2045 Fund (TBLKX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLKX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 1,464,383.96% return.


TBLKX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.36%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.54%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10Y*

FRHMX

1D
1,410,365.12%
1M
1,421,616.96%
YTD
1,464,383.96%
6M
1,461,732.78%
1Y
1,536,763.66%
3Y*
2,494.75%
5Y*
596.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2045 Fund
11.32%19.98%14.79%20.88%-18.12%4.14%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
1,464,383.96%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLKX and FRHMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021

0.70

The correlation between TBLKX and FRHMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLKX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLKX
TBLKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TBLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2045 Fund (TBLKX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLKXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-488,364.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

68,097.73

-68,096.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

470,348.34

-470,345.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

1,985,653.35

-1,985,640.59

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLKX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLKX drawdown since its inception was -26.34%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLKX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLKXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.34%

-15.96%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-3.42%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.75%

-4.90%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-3.49%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

0.81%

+1.30%

Volatility

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2045 Fund (TBLKX) is 4.68%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 955.41%. This indicates that TBLKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLKXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

955.41%

-950.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

955.40%

-945.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

1,413,171.78%

-1,413,159.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

631,989.64%

-631,974.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

538,904.02%

-538,888.67%

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TBLKX and FRHMX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLKX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

TBLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than FRHMX's 103.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
103.07%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%
TBLKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2045 Fund
2.25%2.50%2.01%1.95%1.96%2.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLKX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to TBLKX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLKX dropped -26.34% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

TBLKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLKX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer