PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLAX vs. MLLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLAX achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.48% return.


TBLAX

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.36%
6M
3.27%
YTD
4.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.85%

MLLIX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.32%
6M
2.18%
YTD
3.48%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
4.87%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
4.94%12.08%8.71%12.41%-13.11%1.40%
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
3.48%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLAX and MLLIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.89

The correlation between TBLAX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLAX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBLAX
TBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBLAXMLLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.97

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

8.67

+1.00

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the MLLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLAX and MLLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLAX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLAX and MLLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLAXMLLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-17.32%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-3.86%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.58%

-4.93%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.31%

-16.08%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.64%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-2.14%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.88%

+0.19%

Volatility

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.06%. This indicates that TBLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLAXMLLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.06%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

3.66%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

4.51%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

5.95%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

5.71%

+1.77%

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison

TBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than MLLIX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
7.43%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
3.47%3.64%2.33%2.45%3.65%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLAX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLAX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to MLLIX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLAX dropped -18.31% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.

TBLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLAX and MLLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer