TBLAX vs. MLLIX
TBLAX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund) and MLLIX (MFS Lifetime Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, TBLAX returned 9.74%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for MLLIX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TBLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MLLIX.
Performance
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLAX achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.48% return.
TBLAX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.85%
MLLIX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLAX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund | 4.94% | 12.08% | 8.71% | 12.41% | -13.11% | 1.40% |
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 3.48% | 9.32% | 5.62% | 9.12% | -11.99% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLAX and MLLIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TBLAX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLAX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
TBLAX
MLLIX
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBLAX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.97 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 8.67 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLAX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLAX and MLLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLAX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -17.32% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -3.86% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.58% | -4.93% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.31% | -16.08% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.64% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.46% | -2.14% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.88% | +0.19% |
Volatility
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.06%. This indicates that TBLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLAX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.06% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.05% | 3.66% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 4.51% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 5.95% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 5.71% | +1.77% |
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLAX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison
TBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than MLLIX's 7.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 7.43% | 6.01% | 6.26% | 3.70% | 3.92% | 6.12% | 3.18% | 3.80% | 4.20% | 3.56% | 4.21% | 2.51% |
TBLAX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund | 3.47% | 3.64% | 2.33% | 2.45% | 3.65% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLAX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBLAX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to MLLIX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLAX dropped -18.31% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.
TBLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLAX and MLLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer