TBI vs. CRWD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBI (TrueBlue, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. TBI operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TBI returned -26.05%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TBI vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBI having a 43.52% return and CRWD slightly higher at 44.78%.

TBI

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: 11.43%
• YTD: 43.52%
• 6M: 41.34%
• 1Y: 1.71%
• 3Y*: -28.20%
• 5Y*: -26.05%
• 10Y*: -9.41%

CRWD

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 44.78%
• 6M: 42.24%
• 1Y: 37.35%
• 3Y*: 68.52%
• 5Y*: 21.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBI vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TBI TrueBlue, Inc.	43.52%	-45.83%	-45.24%	-21.65%	-29.24%	48.05%	-22.32%	12.27%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	44.78%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-21.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TBI and CRWD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap TBI : $196.85M CRWD : $175.01B
EPS TBI : -$1.78 CRWD : -$0.02
PS Ratio TBI : 0.16 CRWD : 33.88
PB Ratio TBI : 0.77 CRWD : 37.77
Total Revenue (TTM) TBI : $1.25B CRWD : $5.09B
Gross Profit (TTM) TBI : $354.36M CRWD : $3.82B
EBITDA (TTM) TBI : -$10.26M CRWD : $246.78M

Return for Risk

TBI vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBI

TBI Risk / Return Rank: 44
TBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TBI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TBI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 66
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBI vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	0.83	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	1.38	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.17	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	1.01	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	2.28	-2.22

TBI vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBI Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBI and CRWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBI vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBI drawdown since its inception was -90.50%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBI and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.50%	-67.69%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.90%	-37.18%	-19.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.56%	-44.44%	-38.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.87%	-67.69%	-22.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.02%	-13.23%	-66.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.99%	-23.57%	-19.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.43%	16.45%	+15.98%

Volatility

TBI vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) is 14.23%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that TBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	17.37%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.64%	37.27%	+10.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.45%	45.32%	+18.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.98%	50.65%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.08%	55.96%	-9.88%

Dividends

TBI vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBI nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBI and CRWD in my portfolio?

TBI and CRWD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBI or CRWD?

CRWD has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to TBI (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBI dropped -90.50% vs CRWD's -67.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.