TBI vs. CRWD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).

Performance

TBI vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TBI vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TBI TrueBlue, Inc.	-15.38%	-45.83%	-45.24%	-21.65%	-29.24%	48.05%	-22.32%	13.22%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.10%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TBI : $115.29M CRWD : $101.53B
EPS TBI : -$1.60 CRWD : -$0.73
PS Ratio TBI : 0.10 CRWD : 20.59
PB Ratio TBI : 0.42 CRWD : 22.93
Total Revenue (TTM) TBI : $1.20B CRWD : $4.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) TBI : $367.84M CRWD : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) TBI : -$19.81M CRWD : -$39.16M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TBI having a -15.38% return and CRWD slightly lower at -16.10%.

TBI

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -7.23%
• YTD: -15.38%
• 6M: -39.18%
• 1Y: -27.50%
• 3Y*: -39.97%
• 5Y*: -29.79%
• 10Y*: -17.50%

CRWD

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: -16.10%
• 6M: -21.33%
• 1Y: 8.54%
• 3Y*: 42.04%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TBI vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBI

TBI Risk / Return Rank: 24
TBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
TBI Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TBI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBI vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	0.19	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.60	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.08	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	0.31	-0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	0.79	-1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBI vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBI Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBI and CRWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	0.19	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.58	0.32	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.58	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between TBI and CRWD is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TBI vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither TBI nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TBI vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBI drawdown since its inception was -90.50%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBI and CRWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.50%	-67.69%	-22.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.90%	-37.18%	-19.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.87%	-67.69%	-22.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.22%	-29.45%	-58.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.68%	-23.93%	-18.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.77%	14.60%	+15.17%

Volatility

TBI vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) has a higher volatility of 20.59% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) at 13.42%. This indicates that TBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBI	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.59%	13.42%	+7.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.93%	31.05%	+16.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.45%	45.39%	+22.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.48%	50.17%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.83%	55.91%	-10.08%

Financials