TBI vs. CRWD
TBI (TrueBlue, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. TBI operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TBI returned -24.85%/yr vs 29.29%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TBI vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBI achieves a 48.13% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 59.49% return.
TBI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 48.13%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- -27.19%
- 5Y*
- -24.85%
- 10Y*
- -10.20%
CRWD
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- 59.32%
- YTD
- 59.49%
- 6M
- 42.63%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 70.32%
- 5Y*
- 29.29%
- 10Y*
- —
TBI vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBI TrueBlue, Inc. | 48.13% | -45.83% | -45.24% | -21.65% | -29.24% | 48.05% | -22.32% | 13.22% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 59.49% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBI and CRWD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
TBI:
$203.18M
CRWD:
$192.98B
TBI:
-$1.78
CRWD:
-$0.72
TBI:
0.16
CRWD:
39.33
TBI:
0.79
CRWD:
43.58
TBI:
$1.25B
CRWD:
$4.81B
TBI:
$354.36M
CRWD:
$3.60B
TBI:
-$10.26M
CRWD:
-$39.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBI vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
TBI
CRWD
TBI vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBI | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.43 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 3.29 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBI | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.19 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.58 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.79 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
TBI vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBI drawdown since its inception was -90.50%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBI and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBI | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.50% | -67.69% | -22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.90% | -37.18% | -19.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.56% | -44.44% | -38.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.87% | -67.69% | -22.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.38% | -4.42% | -74.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -23.66% | -19.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.33% | 16.14% | +16.19% |
Volatility
TBI vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) has a higher volatility of 17.97% compared to CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) at 15.34%. This indicates that TBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBI | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.97% | 15.34% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.20% | 36.18% | +11.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.47% | 44.66% | +19.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.81% | 50.73% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 55.95% | -9.91% |
Dividends
TBI vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither TBI nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TBI vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TrueBlue, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TBI and CRWD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBI has higher volatility (17.97%) compared to CRWD (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBI dropped -90.50% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBI and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer