TBGVX vs. FCCNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX).
TBGVX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Jun 14, 1993. FCCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007.
Performance
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 4.44% | 23.86% | 2.47% | 12.48% | -7.52% | 15.62% | -1.00% | 14.64% | -6.72% | 15.03% |
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C | 2.55% | 24.54% | 8.02% | 13.45% | -7.16% | 25.48% | 3.30% | 24.51% | -15.19% | 12.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBGVX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than FCCNX's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TBGVX has underperformed FCCNX with an annualized return of 7.81%, while FCCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
TBGVX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 4.44%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
FCCNX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBGVX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCNX's 1.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TBGVX vs. FCCNX — Risk / Return Rank
TBGVX
FCCNX
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBGVX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.57 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 2.17 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.53 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 10.96 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBGVX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.57 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.54 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.24 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBGVX and FCCNX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Dividend Comparison
TBGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.60%, more than FCCNX's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBGVX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund | 11.60% | 12.11% | 9.95% | 4.55% | 5.68% | 8.89% | 0.94% | 1.88% | 6.74% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 4.94% |
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C | 4.57% | 4.69% | 6.15% | 2.29% | 2.74% | 3.65% | 1.40% | 3.06% | 6.14% | 0.91% | 0.61% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBGVX drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, smaller than the maximum FCCNX drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBGVX and FCCNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBGVX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.97% | -58.44% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -8.36% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -21.39% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.18% | -39.97% | +8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -5.35% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -13.41% | +7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.34% | +0.26% |
Volatility
TBGVX vs. FCCNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) is 4.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that TBGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBGVX | FCCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.78% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 10.39% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 15.66% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.04% | 15.96% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 17.49% | -4.84% |