TBCUX vs. GSIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX).
TBCUX is managed by Tweedy, Browne. It was launched on Oct 25, 2009. GSIMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBCUX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged | 0.24% | 26.69% | -2.49% | 12.70% | -8.18% | 10.77% | -0.02% | 13.68% | -9.00% | 21.79% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.78% | 20.85% | 9.66% | 22.10% | -11.06% | 12.50% | 15.77% | 27.64% | -6.04% | 29.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBCUX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.78% return.
TBCUX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 17.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
GSIMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBCUX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TBCUX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank
TBCUX
GSIMX
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBCUX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.69 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.81 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 7.41 | -2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBCUX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.73 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.81 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBCUX and GSIMX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison
TBCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than GSIMX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBCUX Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged | 8.14% | 8.16% | 18.90% | 1.76% | 1.69% | 1.03% | 0.92% | 2.17% | 1.38% | 1.23% | 1.54% | 1.48% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.93% | 5.12% | 11.18% | 2.36% | 4.89% | 2.23% | 0.18% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBCUX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBCUX and GSIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBCUX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -28.84% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -8.75% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -25.37% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.46% | -6.12% | -5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -4.85% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.15% | +0.89% |
Volatility
TBCUX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 4.78%. This indicates that TBCUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBCUX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.78% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 7.35% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 12.47% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 14.42% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 15.77% | -1.96% |