PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBCUX vs. FSGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBCUX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TBCUX has underperformed FSGEX with an annualized return of 7.07%, while FSGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


TBCUX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.02%
YTD
10.42%
6M
12.99%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
7.07%

FSGEX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.16%
YTD
15.85%
6M
18.73%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBCUX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged
10.42%26.69%-2.49%12.70%-8.18%10.77%-0.02%13.68%-9.00%21.61%
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.85%32.99%5.34%15.56%-15.75%7.77%10.75%21.41%-13.99%27.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TBCUX and FSGEX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.82

The correlation between TBCUX and FSGEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBCUX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBCUX
TBCUX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TBCUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGEX
FSGEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBCUXFSGEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

2.31

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

3.13

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.98

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.80

11.69

-6.89

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBCUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FSGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBCUX and FSGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBCUXFSGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.31

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.42

+0.07

Drawdowns

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBCUX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGEX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBCUX and FSGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBCUXFSGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-34.74%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-11.24%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-13.34%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

-29.66%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-34.74%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

0.00%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-8.45%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.86%

+0.77%

Volatility

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged (TBCUX) is 3.45%, while Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that TBCUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBCUXFSGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

4.95%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

12.28%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

14.56%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

15.40%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

16.22%

-2.33%

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBCUX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBCUX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison

TBCUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than FSGEX's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.61%3.02%2.98%2.90%2.78%2.59%1.68%2.10%2.86%2.48%2.56%2.61%
TBCUX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II - Currency Unhedged
7.39%8.16%18.90%1.76%1.69%1.03%0.92%2.17%1.38%1.23%1.54%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBCUX and FSGEX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSGEX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to TBCUX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBCUX dropped -35.99% vs FSGEX's -34.74%.

FSGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBCUX and FSGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer