PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBCIX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TBCIX having a 4.07% return and MEIKX slightly higher at 4.09%. Over the past 10 years, TBCIX has outperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 17.76%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


TBCIX

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.40%
YTD
4.07%
6M
3.95%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
17.76%

MEIKX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
4.09%
6M
5.41%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
4.07%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.09%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TBCIX and MEIKX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between TBCIX and MEIKX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBCIX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBCIXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.87

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

6.48

-2.37

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBCIX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBCIXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.61

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.40

+0.35

Drawdowns

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBCIX drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBCIX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBCIXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-56.81%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.96%

-6.76%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

-13.15%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-17.50%

-25.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

-36.68%

-6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.20%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-9.45%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

1.95%

+3.07%

Volatility

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 2.24%. This indicates that TBCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBCIXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

2.24%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

7.70%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

10.38%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.91%

13.91%

+10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

16.55%

+6.21%

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBCIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBCIX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

TBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than MEIKX's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.54%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.00%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBCIX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to MEIKX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBCIX dropped -43.26% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

TBCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBCIX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer