PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXT vs. CAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXT vs. CAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT) and AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXT achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than CAM's 1.29% return.


TAXT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.49%
6M
2.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXT vs. CAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXT and CAM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXT vs. CAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT) and AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TAXT vs. CAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXTCAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.80

1.80

+1.00

Drawdowns

TAXT vs. CAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXT drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, which is greater than CAM's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXT and CAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXTCAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-2.19%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.58%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-0.51%

+0.04%

Volatility

TAXT vs. CAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXTCAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

2.12%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.53%

2.12%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.53%

2.12%

+0.41%

TAXT vs. CAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CAM's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TAXT vs. CAM - Dividend Comparison

TAXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than CAM's 2.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAXT and CAM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CAM.

TAXT has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.25% for CAM.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXT and 0.27% for CAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXT and CAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer