PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXS vs. BSMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXS achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.73% return.


TAXS

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSMQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.17%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXS and BSMQ is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXS vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXS

BSMQ
BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXSBSMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

0.25

+2.53

Drawdowns

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXS drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXS and BSMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXSBSMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-13.18%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.12%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-3.48%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

Volatility

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXSBSMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00%

1.33%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.00%

2.68%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.00%

4.79%

-3.79%

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TAXS vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

TAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.76%2.74%2.75%2.47%1.60%1.14%1.57%0.44%
TAXS
Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.83%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXS and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMQ.

BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.83% for TAXS.

TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index, while BSMQ tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXS and 0.18% for BSMQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXS and BSMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer