PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. XB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. XB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than XB's 1.82% return.


TAXM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XB

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.29%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. XB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and XB is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. XB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. XB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXMXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.42

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

15.02

-6.40

TAXM vs. XB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the XB Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and XB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXMXBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.98

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.84

+0.29

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. XB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum XB drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and XB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-9.25%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-2.16%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.47%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-1.32%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.49%

+0.28%

Volatility

TAXM vs. XB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) is 0.94%, while BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that TAXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

1.36%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

2.97%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

3.74%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

7.44%

-3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

7.44%

-3.88%

TAXM vs. XB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. XB - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than XB's 7.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.29%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.08%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and XB have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XB has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to TAXM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs XB's -9.25%.

On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.35% vs 6.62% for TAXM. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 3.29% for TAXM.

TAXM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XB is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.30% for XB.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and XB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer