PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. BSMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.73% return.


TAXM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSMQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.17%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and BSMQ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.38

The correlation between TAXM and BSMQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMQ
BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXMBSMQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

9.43

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

24.69

-16.07

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BSMQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and BSMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXMBSMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.32

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.25

+0.89

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and BSMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMBSMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-13.18%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-0.33%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.12%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-3.48%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.12%

+0.65%

Volatility

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) at 0.39%. This indicates that TAXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMBSMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.39%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

0.94%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

1.33%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

2.68%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

4.79%

-1.23%

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.76%2.74%2.75%2.47%1.60%1.14%1.57%0.44%
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.29%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAXM has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to BSMQ (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs BSMQ's -13.18%.

On 1-year performance, TAXM leads with 6.62% vs 3.08% for BSMQ. On fees, BSMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAXM has performed better with a 6.62% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

TAXM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.76% for BSMQ.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.18% for BSMQ.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and BSMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer