PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 2.26% return.


TAXM

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.61%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.91%

BOXX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.41%
6M
1.95%
YTD
2.26%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$253.32M$264.36M$274.97M
$158.92K$254.95K$177.53K

TAXM vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and BOXX is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAXM vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAXMBOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

8.74

-7.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

60.17

-58.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

505.74

-500.34

TAXM vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and BOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-0.12%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-0.07%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

0.00%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

0.00%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.01%

+0.84%

Volatility

TAXM vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that TAXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.09%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

0.27%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

0.33%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

0.37%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

0.37%

+3.12%

TAXM vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and BOXX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAXM has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

On 1-year performance, TAXM leads with 4.10% vs 4.08% for BOXX. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAXM has performed better with a 4.10% return vs 4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

TAXM has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

TAXM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.19% for BOXX.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.44 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and BOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer