PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXF vs. MFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXF vs. MFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXF achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than MFLX's 1.98% return.


TAXF

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.76%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.67%

MFLX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.47%
6M
1.03%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$144.82K$125.46K$116.25K
$2.10M$2.57M$2.35M

TAXF vs. MFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
0.84%4.30%1.74%7.33%-9.64%2.72%5.55%8.75%0.60%
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
1.98%3.94%3.74%8.98%-19.94%8.43%7.19%16.89%-2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TAXF and MFLX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.34

Over the past year, TAXF and MFLX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXF vs. MFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAXF
TAXF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TAXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MFLX
MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAXF vs. MFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAXFMFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.49

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

9.54

-2.24

TAXF vs. MFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MFLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXF and MFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAXF vs. MFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXF drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, smaller than the maximum MFLX drawdown of -26.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXF and MFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXFMFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-26.76%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-3.11%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

-7.36%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.83%

-25.88%

+12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-5.04%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-8.09%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.81%

+0.05%

Volatility

TAXF vs. MFLX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) at 1.08%. This indicates that TAXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXFMFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.08%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

3.24%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

4.11%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.24%

10.33%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

11.21%

-6.58%

TAXF vs. MFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MFLX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXF vs. MFLX - Dividend Comparison

TAXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than MFLX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
4.20%4.06%3.81%3.65%4.27%3.69%3.21%2.94%3.74%3.80%0.98%
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
3.51%3.68%3.38%2.93%2.05%1.58%2.13%2.64%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXF and MFLX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAXF has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to MFLX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXF dropped -13.93% vs MFLX's -26.76%.

On 5-year performance, TAXF leads with 0.68% vs -0.88% for MFLX. On fees, TAXF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TAXF has performed better with a 0.68% return vs -0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAXF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.51% for TAXF.

They also come from different issuers: American Century and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TAXF and 0.88% for MFLX.

TAXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXF and MFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer