TASVX vs. PRVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX).
TASVX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 5, 1993. PRVIX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2015.
Performance
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.01% | 13.71% | 18.76% | 16.92% | -11.44% | 41.68% | -3.08% | 15.56% | -19.00% | 6.21% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 3.80% | 21.38% | 10.96% | 12.46% | -18.42% | 25.60% | 12.58% | 25.95% | -11.49% | 12.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TASVX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than PRVIX's 3.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TASVX has underperformed PRVIX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while PRVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.
TASVX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
PRVIX
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 33.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TASVX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TASVX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank
TASVX
PRVIX
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TASVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.28 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.06 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 8.59 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TASVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.52 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TASVX and PRVIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison
TASVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than PRVIX's 22.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TASVX PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund | 1.23% | 1.29% | 26.54% | 3.43% | 22.08% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 2.81% | 10.87% | 13.42% | 1.83% | 45.04% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 22.27% | 23.11% | 9.96% | 3.40% | 5.54% | 7.15% | 2.12% | 4.72% | 9.61% | 3.79% | 3.88% | 22.61% |
Drawdowns
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TASVX drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TASVX and PRVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TASVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.79% | -40.95% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -14.06% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.62% | -28.00% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.79% | -40.95% | -18.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -5.60% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -8.44% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.67% | -0.07% |
Volatility
TASVX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) is 6.17%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that TASVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TASVX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.73% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 16.15% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.54% | 23.96% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 20.47% | +2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 21.30% | +5.18% |