PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TASVX vs. PRVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TASVX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly lower than PRVIX's 17.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TASVX having a 10.68% annualized return and PRVIX not far ahead at 10.74%.


TASVX

1D
0.74%
1M
1.72%
YTD
15.17%
6M
15.28%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
10.68%

PRVIX

1D
1.15%
1M
3.65%
YTD
17.26%
6M
16.21%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
15.17%13.71%18.76%16.92%-11.44%41.68%-3.08%15.56%-19.00%6.21%
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
17.26%8.44%10.96%12.46%-18.42%25.60%12.58%25.95%-11.49%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TASVX and PRVIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2015

0.94

The correlation between TASVX and PRVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TASVX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TASVX
TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PRVIX
PRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TASVXPRVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

4.02

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

15.00

+1.02

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TASVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PRVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TASVX and PRVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TASVXPRVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.15

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.33

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.51

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.52

-0.01

Drawdowns

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TASVX drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TASVX and PRVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TASVXPRVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.79%

-40.95%

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.93%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-24.57%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-28.00%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.79%

-40.95%

-18.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-8.33%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.36%

+0.21%

Volatility

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) is 4.25%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that TASVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TASVXPRVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.48%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

12.31%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

16.73%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

19.84%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.46%

21.06%

+5.40%

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TASVX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

TASVX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison

TASVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than PRVIX's 10.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRVIX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I
10.33%12.11%9.96%3.40%5.54%7.15%2.12%4.72%9.61%3.79%3.88%22.61%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
1.12%1.29%26.54%3.43%22.08%1.46%1.38%2.81%10.87%13.42%1.83%45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, TASVX and PRVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRVIX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to TASVX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TASVX dropped -59.79% vs PRVIX's -40.95%.

TASVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TASVX and PRVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer