PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TASVX vs. FISVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TASVX vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TASVX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly lower than FISVX's 18.90% return.


TASVX

1D
0.74%
1M
1.72%
YTD
15.17%
6M
15.28%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
10.68%

FISVX

1D
0.96%
1M
4.03%
YTD
18.90%
6M
18.08%
1Y
43.18%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TASVX vs. FISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
15.17%13.71%18.76%16.92%-11.44%41.68%-3.08%7.51%
FISVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund
18.90%12.70%8.16%14.72%-14.42%28.26%4.49%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TASVX and FISVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.97

The correlation between TASVX and FISVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TASVX vs. FISVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TASVX
TASVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TASVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TASVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TASVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TASVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TASVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FISVX
FISVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TASVX vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TASVXFISVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.54

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.54

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

5.34

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.02

18.11

-2.09

TASVX vs. FISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TASVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FISVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TASVX and FISVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TASVXFISVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.54

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.33

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.42

+0.08

Drawdowns

TASVX vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TASVX drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, which is greater than FISVX's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TASVX and FISVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TASVXFISVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.79%

-44.66%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.54%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.91%

-26.50%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-26.50%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.24%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-10.34%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.51%

+0.06%

Volatility

TASVX vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund (TASVX) is 4.25%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TASVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TASVXFISVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.89%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

11.97%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

17.95%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.61%

21.71%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.46%

26.74%

-0.28%

TASVX vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TASVX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TASVX vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison

TASVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FISVX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund
1.83%2.18%1.70%2.06%3.69%9.55%1.33%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TASVX
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Value Fund
1.12%1.29%26.54%3.43%22.08%1.46%1.38%2.81%10.87%13.42%1.83%45.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TASVX and FISVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISVX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to TASVX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TASVX dropped -59.79% vs FISVX's -44.66%.

FISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TASVX and FISVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer