PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAPR vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAPR vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAPR achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 13.06% return.


TAPR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.58%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
-2.22%
1M
5.54%
YTD
13.06%
6M
17.67%
1Y
46.64%
3Y*
54.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAPR vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAPR and NVDY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAPR vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAPR
TAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAPR vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAPRNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.29

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.66

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

9.00

+10.55

TAPR vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAPR and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAPRNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.72

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

1.64

+0.36

Drawdowns

TAPR vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAPR drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAPR and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAPRNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-34.08%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

-12.81%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-6.66%

+6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-6.15%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

5.20%

-4.86%

Volatility

TAPR vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) is 0.30%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that TAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAPRNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

9.46%

-9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

20.68%

-18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

27.35%

-25.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

38.24%

-34.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

38.24%

-34.51%

TAPR vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAPR vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

TAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.36%.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
61.36%83.10%83.65%22.32%
TAPR
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAPR and NVDY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to TAPR (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAPR dropped -2.60% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 46.64% vs 6.62% for TAPR. On fees, TAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 46.64% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 61.36%, compared with 0.00% for TAPR.

TAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TAPR and 0.99% for NVDY.

TAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAPR and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer