TAIL vs. FYLD
TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAIL is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Cambria, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAIL returned -8.42%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for FYLD. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
TAIL vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 19.37% return.
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -6.35%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- -9.35%
- 3Y*
- -5.78%
- 5Y*
- -8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 41.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
TAIL vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.35% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.37% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAIL and FYLD is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.49 |
The correlation between TAIL and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.49 (all time) to -0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TAIL vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAIL
FYLD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
TAIL
FYLD
Financial Services
TAIL
FYLD
Communication Services
TAIL
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
TAIL
FYLD
Healthcare
TAIL
FYLD
-
Industrials
TAIL
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
TAIL
FYLD
Energy
TAIL
FYLD
Utilities
TAIL
FYLD
Real Estate
TAIL
FYLD
-
Basic Materials
TAIL
FYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAIL vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TAIL
FYLD
TAIL vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAIL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.65 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 7.61 | -8.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.13 | 27.21 | -29.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAIL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | 3.60 | -4.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | 0.71 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.46 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
TAIL vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAIL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.36% | -44.55% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -5.44% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.69% | -15.15% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -25.12% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.65% | -0.82% | -50.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -8.83% | -20.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 1.52% | +2.88% |
Volatility
TAIL vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is 0.87%, while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that TAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAIL | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 3.03% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 8.79% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.51% | 11.50% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 16.23% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 18.03% | -3.09% |
TAIL vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TAIL and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
TAIL vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FYLD's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.62% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.50% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAIL and FYLD have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYLD has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to TAIL (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.36% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 5-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.54% vs -8.42% for TAIL. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.54% return vs -8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAIL and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 3.50% for TAIL.
TAIL is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FYLD is Global Equities.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAIL and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer