TAIL vs. AUGT
TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAIL is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Cambria, while AUGT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TAIL returned -5.39%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for AUGT. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TAIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for AUGT.
Performance
TAIL vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -8.57% return, which is significantly lower than AUGT's 10.07% return.
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -10.68%
- 3Y*
- -5.39%
- 5Y*
- -8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.32%
AUGT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 16.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $523.03K | $254.87K | $231.67K | |
| $1.50M | $1.48M | $2.06M |
TAIL vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -8.57% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -2.62% |
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF | 10.07% | 14.64% | 19.69% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAIL and AUGT is -0.68, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | -0.59 |
The correlation between TAIL and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.68 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAIL vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank
TAIL
AUGT
TAIL vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAIL | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.48 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 3.17 | -3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 16.47 | -18.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAIL vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than AUGT's maximum drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and AUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAIL | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.79% | -13.12% | -39.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -5.36% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.57% | -13.12% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.79% | 0.00% | -52.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.53% | -1.18% | -28.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 1.03% | +5.28% |
Volatility
TAIL vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) at 1.54%. This indicates that TAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAIL | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.85% | 1.54% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.69% | 5.52% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.34% | 7.19% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 9.98% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 9.98% | +4.85% |
TAIL vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AUGT's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAIL vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison
TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while AUGT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.00% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAIL and AUGT have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAIL has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to AUGT (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.79% vs AUGT's -13.12%.
On 3-year performance, AUGT leads with 16.82% vs -5.39% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AUGT has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 16.82% return vs -5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for AUGT.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for AUGT.
TAIL is categorized as Equity Hedged, while AUGT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TAIL and 0.74% for AUGT.
AUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAIL and AUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer