TAIBX vs. PCGTX
TAIBX (PGIM Core Bond Fund) and PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, TAIBX returned 1.38%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for PCGTX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TAIBX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PCGTX.
Performance
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAIBX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 1.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TAIBX having a 1.38% annualized return and PCGTX not far behind at 1.37%.
TAIBX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.21%
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
TAIBX PGIM Core Bond Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIBX PGIM Core Bond Fund | -0.78% | 7.36% | 1.44% | 5.89% | -14.59% | -1.73% | 8.40% | 9.13% | -0.44% | 4.03% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 1.84% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAIBX and PCGTX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.77 |
The correlation between TAIBX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAIBX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank
TAIBX
PCGTX
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAIBX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.25 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 6.10 | -4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAIBX drawdown since its inception was -20.09%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIBX and PCGTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAIBX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -19.34% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -3.09% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.47% | -6.80% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.76% | -19.19% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.09% | -19.34% | -0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -2.44% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -1.85% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.11% | +0.16% |
Volatility
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Core Bond Fund (TAIBX) is 1.02%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that TAIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAIBX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.58% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.75% | 4.77% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 5.67% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 7.22% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | 5.43% | -0.35% |
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAIBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAIBX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison
TAIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than PCGTX's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.23% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
TAIBX PGIM Core Bond Fund | 4.17% | 4.41% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.48% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 2.53% | 2.55% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAIBX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCGTX has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to TAIBX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIBX dropped -20.09% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.
PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAIBX and PCGTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer