PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAHTX vs. CCLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica High Yield Bond (TAHTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAHTX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 2.24% return.


TAHTX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.34%
6M
2.34%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
4.36%

CCLFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.84%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TAHTX
Transamerica High Yield Bond
1.34%8.73%7.83%9.14%-13.10%6.22%3.66%6.41%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
2.24%8.93%12.62%12.66%2.32%10.38%8.73%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TAHTX and CCLFX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAHTX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAHTX
TAHTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TAHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TAHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CCLFX
CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica High Yield Bond (TAHTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAHTXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

8.50

-6.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.05

20.11

-16.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

7.23

-5.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

39.25

-36.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

217.03

-201.31

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAHTX and CCLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAHTXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

8.50

-6.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

5.10

-4.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

4.57

-4.18

Drawdowns

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAHTX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAHTX and CCLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAHTXCCLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-3.91%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-0.19%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

-0.46%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

-2.25%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-0.16%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.03%

+0.51%

Volatility

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica High Yield Bond (TAHTX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.24%. This indicates that TAHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAHTXCCLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.24%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

0.65%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

0.88%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

1.73%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.11%

1.88%

+4.23%

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAHTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

TAHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, less than CCLFX's 10.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
10.29%10.47%11.27%10.96%3.96%7.03%6.90%0.61%0.00%0.00%
TAHTX
Transamerica High Yield Bond
7.02%6.94%6.60%4.20%3.74%4.59%4.67%5.57%6.30%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAHTX and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAHTX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to CCLFX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAHTX dropped -23.40% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAHTX and CCLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer