TAHTX vs. CCLFX
TAHTX (Transamerica High Yield Bond) and CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TAHTX returned 3.01%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for CCLFX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAHTX charges 0.58%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for CCLFX.
Performance
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAHTX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 2.24% return.
TAHTX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAHTX Transamerica High Yield Bond | 1.34% | 8.73% | 7.83% | 9.14% | -13.10% | 6.22% | 3.66% | 6.41% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 2.24% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAHTX and CCLFX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAHTX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
TAHTX
CCLFX
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica High Yield Bond (TAHTX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAHTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 8.50 | -6.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.05 | 20.11 | -16.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 7.23 | -5.72 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 39.25 | -36.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 217.03 | -201.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAHTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 8.50 | -6.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 5.10 | -4.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 4.57 | -4.18 |
Drawdowns
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAHTX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAHTX and CCLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAHTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -3.91% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -0.19% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.41% | -0.46% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -2.25% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -0.16% | -4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.03% | +0.51% |
Volatility
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica High Yield Bond (TAHTX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.24%. This indicates that TAHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAHTX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.24% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 0.65% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56% | 0.88% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 1.73% | +3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.11% | 1.88% | +4.23% |
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAHTX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAHTX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
TAHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, less than CCLFX's 10.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.29% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAHTX Transamerica High Yield Bond | 7.02% | 6.94% | 6.60% | 4.20% | 3.74% | 4.59% | 4.67% | 5.57% | 6.30% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAHTX and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAHTX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to CCLFX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAHTX dropped -23.40% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.50 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAHTX and CCLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer