PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGG vs. THYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGG vs. THYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF (THYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGG achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than THYF's 1.66% return.


TAGG

1D
0.12%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.50%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
10Y*

THYF

1D
0.16%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGG vs. THYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
0.29%7.40%1.73%5.72%2.99%
THYF
T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF
1.66%7.77%8.51%11.32%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGG and THYF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.42

TAGG vs. THYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TAGG
THYF

Technology

52.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

15.2%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
3.9%

Healthcare

5.0%
9.8%

Industrials

3.5%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.3%
18.3%

Utilities

1.3%
1.4%

Energy

0.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

0.6%
34.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
6.8%

Technology

TAGG
52.7%
THYF
3.7%

Communication Services

TAGG
15.2%
THYF
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TAGG
14.3%
THYF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

TAGG
5.5%
THYF
3.9%

Healthcare

TAGG
5.0%
THYF
9.8%

Industrials

TAGG
3.5%
THYF
6.1%

Basic Materials

TAGG
1.3%
THYF
18.3%

Utilities

TAGG
1.3%
THYF
1.4%

Energy

TAGG
0.6%
THYF
4.3%

Financial Services

TAGG
0.6%
THYF
34.0%

Real Estate

TAGG
0.2%
THYF
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGG vs. THYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGG
TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

THYF
THYF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
THYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
THYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
THYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
THYF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGG vs. THYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF (THYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGGTHYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.50

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

11.43

-7.23

TAGG vs. THYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the THYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGG and THYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGGTHYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.00

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

1.48

-1.44

Drawdowns

TAGG vs. THYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGG drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, which is greater than THYF's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGG and THYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGGTHYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-5.24%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.80%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-5.07%

-1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.19%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-0.82%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.61%

+0.47%

Volatility

TAGG vs. THYF - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF (THYF) at 1.13%. This indicates that TAGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGGTHYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.13%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.71%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

3.52%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

5.82%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.53%

5.82%

+0.71%

TAGG vs. THYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than THYF's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGG vs. THYF - Dividend Comparison

TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than THYF's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
4.58%4.36%4.36%3.48%3.67%0.33%
THYF
T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF
7.01%7.17%7.30%8.02%1.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGG and THYF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGG has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to THYF (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGG dropped -17.26% vs THYF's -5.24%.

On 3-year performance, THYF leads with 8.65% vs 4.06% for TAGG. On fees, TAGG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, THYF has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAGG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for THYF.

THYF has the higher dividend yield at 7.01%, compared with 4.58% for TAGG.

TAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while THYF is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TAGG and 0.56% for THYF.

THYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGG and THYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer