PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGG vs. OVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGG vs. OVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGG achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than OVB's 2.58% return.


TAGG

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.16%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*

OVB

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.47%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGG vs. OVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
0.18%7.40%1.73%5.72%-12.63%0.01%
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
2.58%7.72%4.03%6.89%-16.96%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGG and OVB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.80

The correlation between TAGG and OVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

TAGG vs. OVB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TAGG
OVB

Technology

52.7%
35.6%

Communication Services

15.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.0%
8.5%

Industrials

3.5%
8.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.8%

Utilities

1.3%
2.4%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.6%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.9%

Technology

TAGG
52.7%
OVB
35.6%

Communication Services

TAGG
15.2%
OVB
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TAGG
14.3%
OVB
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

TAGG
5.5%
OVB
4.9%

Healthcare

TAGG
5.0%
OVB
8.5%

Industrials

TAGG
3.5%
OVB
8.3%

Basic Materials

TAGG
1.3%
OVB
1.8%

Utilities

TAGG
1.3%
OVB
2.4%

Energy

TAGG
0.6%
OVB
3.5%

Financial Services

TAGG
0.6%
OVB
11.8%

Real Estate

TAGG
0.2%
OVB
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGG vs. OVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGG
TAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

OVB
OVB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
OVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGG vs. OVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGGOVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.85

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

12.52

-7.66

TAGG vs. OVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the OVB Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGG and OVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGGOVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.26

-0.22

Drawdowns

TAGG vs. OVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGG drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum OVB drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGG and OVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGGOVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-21.69%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.49%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.40%

-8.18%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.37%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-7.04%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.76%

+0.32%

Volatility

TAGG vs. OVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) is 1.19%, while Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that TAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGGOVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.49%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

4.69%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

5.80%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

7.31%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.53%

7.58%

-1.05%

TAGG vs. OVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than OVB's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGG vs. OVB - Dividend Comparison

TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than OVB's 6.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVB
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
6.96%6.00%5.81%5.20%4.67%4.59%3.88%0.58%
TAGG
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF
4.58%4.36%4.36%3.48%3.67%0.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGG and OVB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVB has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to TAGG (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGG dropped -17.26% vs OVB's -21.69%.

On 3-year performance, OVB leads with 5.95% vs 4.26% for TAGG. On fees, TAGG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OVB has performed better with a 5.95% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAGG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVB.

OVB has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 4.58% for TAGG.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TAGG and 0.79% for OVB.

OVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGG and OVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer