TAGG vs. DBO
TAGG (T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. TAGG is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TAGG returned 4.26%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. TAGG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
TAGG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGG achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
TAGG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
TAGG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF | 0.18% | 7.40% | 1.73% | 5.72% | -12.63% | 0.01% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGG and DBO is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | -0.15 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TAGG and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
TAGG vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TAGG
DBO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
TAGG
DBO
-
Communication Services
TAGG
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TAGG
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
TAGG
DBO
-
Healthcare
TAGG
DBO
-
Industrials
TAGG
DBO
-
Basic Materials
TAGG
DBO
-
Utilities
TAGG
DBO
-
Energy
TAGG
DBO
-
Financial Services
TAGG
DBO
Real Estate
TAGG
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
TAGG
DBO
TAGG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.44 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 9.02 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.34 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.02 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
TAGG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGG drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -90.18% | +72.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -18.19% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.40% | -28.20% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -51.38% | +49.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -62.25% | +55.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 8.92% | -7.84% |
Volatility
TAGG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF (TAGG) is 1.19%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that TAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 12.61% | -11.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 28.20% | -25.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 34.46% | -30.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 32.29% | -25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 31.78% | -25.25% |
TAGG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
TAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
TAGG T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.36% | 4.36% | 3.48% | 3.67% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGG and DBO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to TAGG (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGG dropped -17.26% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 4.26% for TAGG. On fees, TAGG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
TAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
TAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TAGG and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer