TADAX vs. ANFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TADAX (Transamerica US Growth) and ANFFX (American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TADAX returned 16.83%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for ANFFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TADAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for ANFFX.

Performance

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica US Growth (TADAX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TADAX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than ANFFX's 22.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TADAX having a 16.83% annualized return and ANFFX not far behind at 16.32%.

TADAX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 9.07%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: 23.80%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: 16.83%

ANFFX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 10.68%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 25.32%
• 1Y: 54.64%
• 3Y*: 30.64%
• 5Y*: 14.27%
• 10Y*: 16.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TADAX Transamerica US Growth	10.15%	17.09%	28.81%	41.45%	-31.60%	20.65%	35.85%	39.41%	-0.52%	28.71%
ANFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1	22.86%	30.96%	23.52%	29.10%	-29.69%	11.98%	33.43%	26.38%	-4.41%	34.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TADAX and ANFFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.93

The correlation between TADAX and ANFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TADAX vs. ANFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TADAX

TADAX Risk / Return Rank: 31
TADAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
TADAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TADAX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TADAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TADAX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

ANFFX

ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica US Growth (TADAX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TADAX	ANFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	3.26	-1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	4.07	-1.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.55	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	4.19	-2.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	18.73	-12.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TADAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the ANFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TADAX and ANFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TADAX	ANFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	3.26	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.74	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.86	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.53	+0.18

Drawdowns

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TADAX drawdown since its inception was -39.29%, smaller than the maximum ANFFX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TADAX and ANFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TADAX	ANFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.29%	-55.37%	+16.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.48%	-13.36%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.04%	-20.81%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.29%	-37.10%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.29%	-37.10%	-2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	0.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.40%	-11.37%	+4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	2.98%	+1.82%

Volatility

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica US Growth (TADAX) is 4.08%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that TADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TADAX	ANFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	5.30%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	13.71%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	17.19%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.14%	19.39%	+3.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	19.11%	+2.84%

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TADAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ANFFX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

TADAX vs. ANFFX - Dividend Comparison

TADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than ANFFX's 8.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1	8.06%	9.90%	9.56%	3.89%	0.00%	7.53%	2.45%	7.26%	9.84%	8.19%	2.13%	6.07%
TADAX Transamerica US Growth	4.17%	4.59%	16.73%	3.66%	4.60%	13.56%	9.73%	8.29%	12.42%	10.92%	2.29%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TADAX and ANFFX in my portfolio?

TADAX and ANFFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TADAX or ANFFX?

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to TADAX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TADAX dropped -39.29% vs ANFFX's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.