TACU vs. USPX
TACU (T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TACU is actively managed, while USPX is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TACU charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
TACU vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TACU having a 7.69% return and USPX slightly higher at 7.76%.
TACU
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USPX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
TACU vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 7.69% | -0.70% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 7.76% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACU and USPX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACU vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
TACU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USPX
TACU vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACU | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACU vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACU drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACU and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACU | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -31.21% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -3.34% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -4.43% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
TACU vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACU | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 12.66% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 16.28% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 15.95% | -2.10% |
TACU vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACU has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TACU vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
TACU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACU T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TACU and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for TACU.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for TACU.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TACU and 0.03% for USPX.
Find the right allocation for TACU and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer