PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TACK vs. EZRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TACK vs. EZRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than EZRO's 1.82% return.


TACK

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.46%
YTD
5.30%
6M
4.38%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
10Y*

EZRO

1D
-3.25%
1M
-8.26%
YTD
1.82%
6M
0.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACK vs. EZRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TACK and EZRO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TACK vs. EZRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EZRO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACK vs. EZRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF (EZRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TACKEZRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

TACK vs. EZRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TACK vs. EZRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than EZRO's maximum drawdown of -12.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and EZRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TACKEZRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-12.08%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-9.62%

+8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-3.92%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

Volatility

TACK vs. EZRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TACKEZRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

20.94%

-11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

20.94%

-9.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.23%

20.94%

-9.71%

TACK vs. EZRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EZRO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TACK vs. EZRO - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while EZRO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EZRO
AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.21%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TACK and EZRO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EZRO.

TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for EZRO.

They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and AlphaDroid. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 1.01% for EZRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TACK and EZRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer