TACK vs. CGDV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV).

TACK and CGDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TACK is an actively managed fund by Fairlead. It was launched on Mar 22, 2022. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.

Performance

TACK vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TACK vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	2.15%	10.93%	11.76%	7.43%	-5.41%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	-1.69%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -1.69% return.

TACK

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 13.43%
• 3Y*: 9.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACK vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

TACK

Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund

CGDV

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

Return for Risk

TACK vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACK

TACK Risk / Return Rank: 56
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 73
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACK vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TACK	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.28	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.86	-0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.99	-0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.72	8.44	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TACK vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TACK and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TACK	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.28	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.05	-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between TACK and CGDV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TACK vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than CGDV's 1.33% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	1.24%	1.18%	1.26%	1.29%	0.89%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.33%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%

Drawdowns

TACK vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACK	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.49%	-21.82%	+7.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.74%	-10.91%	+1.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	-6.61%	+2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.31%	-3.72%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.57%	-0.53%

Volatility

TACK vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) is 4.06%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that TACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TACK	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	5.55%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.48%	9.27%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	16.76%	-3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.33%	15.61%	-4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.33%	15.61%	-4.28%