T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L
T3GB.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - T3GB.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist, while FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, T3GB.L returned 4.01%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for FWRA.L. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. T3GB.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.
Performance
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
T3GB.L is traded in GBp, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T3GB.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 10.60% return.
T3GB.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
T3GB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist | 0.73% | 4.94% | 3.79% | 2.76% |
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.60% | 13.69% | 20.10% | 9.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between T3GB.L and FWRA.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between T3GB.L and FWRA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
T3GB.L
FWRA.L
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (T3GB.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T3GB.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.34 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.20 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.64 | 11.68 | +4.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T3GB.L drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum FWRA.L drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T3GB.L and FWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T3GB.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -17.88% | +11.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.72% | -6.94% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.91% | -17.88% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.57% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -2.04% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 1.90% | -1.71% |
Volatility
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (T3GB.L) is 0.35%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that T3GB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T3GB.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 3.33% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 10.05% | -9.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20% | 12.38% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 13.05% | -11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.81% | 13.05% | -11.24% |
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
T3GB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
T3GB.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
T3GB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T3GB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist | 3.84% | 3.95% | 4.36% | 4.05% | 1.98% | 0.28% | 1.15% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
T3GB.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, T3GB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
T3GB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRA.L.
T3GB.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. T3GB.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for T3GB.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for T3GB.L and FWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer