PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

T1AP.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T1AP.L achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 12.31% return.


T1AP.L

1D
0.32%
1M
0.33%
6M
1.66%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*

IGDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.57%
6M
9.59%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
T1AP.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.33%-2.78%6.89%-0.80%13.03%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.58%10.30%20.00%23.22%-11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between T1AP.L and IGDA.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T1AP.L
T1AP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
T1AP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T1AP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


T1AP.LIGDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.46

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

11.18

-8.41

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T1AP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T1AP.L and IGDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T1AP.L drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, roughly equal to the maximum IGDA.L drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T1AP.L and IGDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


T1AP.LIGDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-22.43%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-7.19%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-22.43%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.88%

-3.56%

-12.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-4.18%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.23%

-0.48%

Volatility

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) is 1.64%, while Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that T1AP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


T1AP.LIGDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.30%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

11.41%

-6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

14.46%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

16.58%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,962.48%

16.58%

+2,945.90%

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

T1AP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

T1AP.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither T1AP.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


T1AP.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, T1AP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

T1AP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.

T1AP.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. T1AP.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for T1AP.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T1AP.L and IGDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer