PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBZ.DE achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than XG7S.DE's 0.23% return.


SYBZ.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.50%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*

XG7S.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.23%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
-0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
0.96%-4.27%3.98%1.41%-11.02%2.85%-0.73%8.89%6.28%
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.23%-4.70%2.17%1.03%-13.47%0.52%0.56%7.95%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

0.82

The correlation between SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBZ.DE
SYBZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XG7S.DE
XG7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBZ.DEXG7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.95

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.47

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

-0.91

+0.98

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBZ.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

-0.33

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.38

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.16

-0.02

Drawdowns

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum XG7S.DE drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBZ.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-21.08%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-2.81%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.58%

-7.74%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.01%

-18.20%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-19.11%

+7.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-8.76%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.45%

-0.18%

Volatility

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) is 0.99%, while Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that SYBZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBZ.DEXG7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.23%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.53%

2.97%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

3.98%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

6.39%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

5.85%

+0.36%

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBZ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7S.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBZ.DE vs. XG7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while XG7S.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
2.68%2.96%2.51%1.86%1.38%0.98%1.40%1.41%0.70%
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBZ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XG7S.DE.

SYBZ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond, while XG7S.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SYBZ.DE and 0.20% for XG7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBZ.DE and XG7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer