PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBW.DE achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRV.DE's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBW.DE has underperformed ZPRV.DE with an annualized return of 1.33%, while ZPRV.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.


SYBW.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
1.76%
6M
3.44%
YTD
3.59%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
1.33%

ZPRV.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
5.86%
6M
20.88%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.59%-6.50%9.98%0.49%2.02%7.59%-6.16%5.97%6.10%-11.87%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
20.36%2.99%14.07%19.11%-5.40%48.22%-1.86%27.40%-11.77%-3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.15

The correlation between SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBW.DE
SYBW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBW.DEZPRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.39

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

5.80

-4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

18.15

-13.79

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBW.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBW.DEZPRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-46.04%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-5.87%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-31.14%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.61%

-31.14%

+18.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.37%

-46.04%

+25.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-1.26%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-9.07%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.88%

-0.47%

Volatility

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) is 1.52%, while SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that SYBW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBW.DEZPRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

3.44%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

9.54%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

15.54%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

20.36%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

22.82%

-12.35%

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBW.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SYBW.DE vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while ZPRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.83%4.34%3.98%3.01%0.64%0.54%1.91%2.03%1.33%1.05%0.68%0.53%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBW.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBW.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

SYBW.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while ZPRV.DE is Small Cap Value Equities. SYBW.DE tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SYBW.DE and 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBW.DE and ZPRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer