PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBW.DE achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly higher than UEEG.DE's -0.84% return.


SYBW.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.61%
6M
2.39%
YTD
3.77%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
1.29%

UEEG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.77%-6.50%9.98%0.49%2.02%7.59%-2.90%
UEEG.DE
iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.84%4.64%0.67%2.27%-9.47%-2.61%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBW.DE and UEEG.DE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBW.DE
SYBW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

UEEG.DE
UEEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBW.DEUEEG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.56

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

1.28

+2.08

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBW.DE and UEEG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBW.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than UEEG.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBW.DE and UEEG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBW.DEUEEG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-13.77%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-2.30%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-3.22%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.61%

-12.90%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

-6.19%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-7.23%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

1.01%

+0.39%

Volatility

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) at 1.00%. This indicates that SYBW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEEG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBW.DEUEEG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.00%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

2.78%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

3.62%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

4.30%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

4.03%

+6.44%

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBW.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UEEG.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBW.DE vs. UEEG.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while UEEG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.82%4.34%3.98%3.01%0.64%0.54%1.91%2.03%1.33%1.05%0.68%0.53%
UEEG.DE
iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBW.DE and UEEG.DE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBW.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBW.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UEEG.DE.

SYBW.DE tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while UEEG.DE tracks FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SYBW.DE and 0.18% for UEEG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBW.DE and UEEG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer