PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBW.DE achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.DE's 4.60% return.


SYBW.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
1.76%
6M
3.44%
YTD
3.59%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
1.33%

BBLL.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
1.78%
6M
4.43%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.59%-6.50%9.98%0.49%2.02%7.59%-6.16%1.48%
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.60%-7.36%11.29%1.33%7.29%8.35%-8.23%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2019

0.96

The correlation between SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBW.DE
SYBW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBW.DEBBLL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.00

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

4.74

-0.38

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBW.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than BBLL.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBW.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-17.24%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-3.38%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-11.65%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.61%

-11.65%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-5.47%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-8.30%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.43%

-0.02%

Volatility

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) is 1.52%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that SYBW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBLL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBW.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

1.69%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

4.30%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

6.06%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

7.45%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

8.27%

+2.20%

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBW.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBLL.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBW.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while BBLL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.83%4.34%3.98%3.01%0.64%0.54%1.91%2.03%1.33%1.05%0.68%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SYBW.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBW.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBLL.DE.

SYBW.DE tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SYBW.DE and 0.07% for BBLL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBW.DE and BBLL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer