PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBU.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBU.DE achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM.DE's 27.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBU.DE has underperformed SPYM.DE with an annualized return of 0.99%, while SPYM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.


SYBU.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
2.21%
6M
3.68%
YTD
3.68%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
0.99%

SPYM.DE

1D
2.08%
1M
-1.45%
6M
23.96%
YTD
27.63%
1Y
45.61%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBU.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.68%-4.60%7.05%1.35%-7.76%6.46%-2.35%11.44%4.64%-9.37%
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
27.63%19.06%14.05%6.05%-14.90%5.28%6.27%22.31%-11.26%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2011

0.06

The correlation between SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBU.DE
SYBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SYBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM.DE
SPYM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBU.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBU.DESPYM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

4.37

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

14.29

-8.63

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.67%, smaller than the maximum SPYM.DE drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBU.DESPYM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.67%

-44.83%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-10.38%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.88%

-18.95%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

-23.25%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.01%

-31.69%

+10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-5.10%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-17.60%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

3.18%

-1.87%

Volatility

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBU.DE) is 1.89%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that SYBU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBU.DESPYM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

9.36%

-7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

17.37%

-13.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.79%

19.86%

-14.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

17.25%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

18.51%

-7.73%

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBU.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBU.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while SPYM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBU.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.07%4.41%3.68%2.77%2.06%1.84%2.61%2.59%2.26%2.54%2.11%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBU.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBU.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

SYBU.DE is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SPYM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SYBU.DE tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while SPYM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SYBU.DE and 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBU.DE and SPYM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer