SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE
SYBQ.DE (SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and XLIQ.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - SYBQ.DE tracks the Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5 while XLIQ.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SYBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
XLIQ.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBQ.DE SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.56% | 1.45% | 9.69% | 9.38% | -10.85% | 6.75% | -2.82% | 10.80% | -2.02% | -1.92% |
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 1.86% | 2.53% | 5.99% | -17.96% | -3.19% | 2.70% | 4.95% | -0.24% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2014 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SYBQ.DE
XLIQ.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYBQ.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYBQ.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYBQ.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | — | — |
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SYBQ.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
SYBQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, while XLIQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBQ.DE SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.63% | 4.72% | 4.29% | 3.04% | 1.88% | 1.71% | 1.87% | 1.84% | 1.92% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 2.58% |
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
SYBQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5, while XLIQ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for SYBQ.DE and XLIQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer