PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBQ.DE achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.DE's 11.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBQ.DE has underperformed SPY5.DE with an annualized return of 1.36%, while SPY5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.


SYBQ.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.26%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
1.36%

SPY5.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.37%
YTD
11.39%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
14.76%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.59%1.45%9.71%9.39%-10.87%6.77%-2.67%10.78%-2.02%-1.92%
SPY5.DE
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.39%4.75%32.36%22.42%-14.24%40.60%6.73%34.93%0.25%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.30

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (10 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBQ.DE
SYBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.DE
SPY5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPY5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBQ.DESPY5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

3.57

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

12.77

-11.13

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SPY5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBQ.DESPY5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.22

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.96

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.93

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.97

-0.89

Drawdowns

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.32%, smaller than the maximum SPY5.DE drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBQ.DESPY5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-33.86%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-7.15%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-23.34%

+17.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.50%

-23.34%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

-33.86%

+13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.44%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-3.95%

-5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.00%

-0.85%

Volatility

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) is 1.77%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.DE) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that SYBQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBQ.DESPY5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.66%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

7.54%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

11.51%

-6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

15.18%

-8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.07%

+1.51%

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBQ.DE vs. SPY5.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than SPY5.DE's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY5.DE
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.99%1.03%1.22%1.42%0.95%1.37%1.74%3.30%1.59%1.57%1.69%
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.67%4.72%4.31%3.04%1.88%1.71%2.04%1.84%1.92%2.48%2.57%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY5.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SYBQ.DE.

SYBQ.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while SPY5.DE is S&P 500. SYBQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5, while SPY5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SYBQ.DE and 0.03% for SPY5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBQ.DE and SPY5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer