PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBQ.DE achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than PR1C.DE's 0.63% return.


SYBQ.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.20%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
1.36%

PR1C.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.47%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.59%1.45%9.71%9.39%-10.87%6.77%-2.67%7.16%
PR1C.DE
Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
0.63%3.02%4.32%7.43%-13.89%-1.11%2.40%4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.34

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBQ.DE
SYBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1C.DE
PR1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PR1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBQ.DEPR1C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

2.59

-0.95

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the PR1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBQ.DEPR1C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.65

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

-0.01

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.16

-0.08

Drawdowns

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.32%, which is greater than PR1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBQ.DEPR1C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-17.73%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-2.61%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-2.61%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.50%

-17.73%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.67%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-5.51%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.77%

+0.38%

Volatility

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE) at 1.07%. This indicates that SYBQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBQ.DEPR1C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.07%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

2.69%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

3.07%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

4.43%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

5.08%

+12.50%

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1C.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBQ.DE vs. PR1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PR1C.DE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PR1C.DE
Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
2.54%2.55%2.19%1.80%1.44%1.32%1.38%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.67%4.72%4.31%3.04%1.88%1.71%2.04%1.84%1.92%2.48%2.57%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1C.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SYBQ.DE.

SYBQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5, while PR1C.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SYBQ.DE and 0.07% for PR1C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBQ.DE and PR1C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer