SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE
SYBM.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and CEB0.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SYBM.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while CEB0.DE tracks the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SYBM.DE returned 3.27% vs 1.54% for CEB0.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SYBM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CEB0.DE.
Performance
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYBM.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than CEB0.DE's 1.63% return.
SYBM.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SYBM.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 0.49% | 2.47% | 3.25% |
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.63% | 0.43% | 6.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYBM.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SYBM.DE
CEB0.DE
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYBM.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.43 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 3.02 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYBM.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.03 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYBM.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBM.DE and CEB0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYBM.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -1.83% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -1.11% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -0.34% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.10% | -0.38% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.52% | +0.74% |
Volatility
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 1.02%. This indicates that SYBM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYBM.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.02% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | 1.45% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.07% | 1.68% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 2.03% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 2.03% | +5.79% |
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYBM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CEB0.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYBM.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison
SYBM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than CEB0.DE's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.81% | 1.84% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYBM.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 5.07% | 5.01% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 4.29% | 3.89% | 4.12% | 4.34% | 4.13% | 5.01% | 4.30% | 5.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYBM.DE and CEB0.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEB0.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEB0.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SYBM.DE.
SYBM.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SYBM.DE and 0.40% for CEB0.DE.
Find the right allocation for SYBM.DE and CEB0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer