PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBL.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBL.DE achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than IBCM.DE's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBL.DE has underperformed IBCM.DE with an annualized return of -4.51%, while IBCM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher -0.17% annualized return.


SYBL.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
0.76%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
-2.76%
1Y
-2.42%
3Y*
-1.08%
5Y*
-10.98%
10Y*
-4.51%

IBCM.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.03%
1Y
0.68%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
-2.34%
10Y*
-0.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBL.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
-3.01%-1.00%-6.77%3.36%-43.17%0.20%6.07%17.90%-1.01%-0.58%
IBCM.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.27%1.53%0.84%8.74%-19.91%-3.09%4.08%6.64%1.32%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.63

The correlation between SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBL.DE
SYBL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SYBL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCM.DE
IBCM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBCM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBL.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBL.DEIBCM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.03

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

0.08

-0.65

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the IBCM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBL.DEIBCM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.03

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

-0.31

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

-0.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.59

-0.66

Drawdowns

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, which is greater than IBCM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBL.DEIBCM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-23.25%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-4.08%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-4.53%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.48%

-22.90%

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.50%

-23.25%

-34.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.83%

-13.71%

-39.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-5.23%

-15.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

1.53%

+2.86%

Volatility

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (SYBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBCM.DE) at 1.94%. This indicates that SYBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBL.DEIBCM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

1.94%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

4.20%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

5.00%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

7.39%

+13.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

6.03%

+11.66%

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBL.DE vs. IBCM.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than IBCM.DE's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCM.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.92%2.82%2.73%1.97%0.13%0.00%0.09%0.63%0.75%0.76%0.80%1.09%
SYBL.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
5.11%4.88%4.32%2.96%1.73%0.85%1.05%1.36%1.58%1.90%2.13%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SYBL.DE tracks Bloomberg UK Gilt 15+, while IBCM.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBL.DE and IBCM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer