SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L
SYBK.DE (SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist)) and EMLI.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - SYBK.DE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg SASB US Corporate High Yield ESG Ex-Controversies Select, while EMLI.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYBK.DE returned 4.73%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for EMLI.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SYBK.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for EMLI.L.
Performance
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SYBK.DE is traded in EUR, while EMLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMLI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SYBK.DE having a 2.75% return and EMLI.L slightly higher at 2.80%. Over the past 10 years, SYBK.DE has outperformed EMLI.L with an annualized return of 4.73%, while EMLI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.
SYBK.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
EMLI.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBK.DE SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) | 2.75% | -4.18% | 15.91% | 8.73% | -5.33% | 13.84% | -4.47% | 12.57% | 4.33% | -7.71% |
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 2.81% | 2.78% | 3.15% | 10.27% | 0.24% | 1.55% | -6.48% | 15.59% | -2.52% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYBK.DE and EMLI.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.38 |
The correlation between SYBK.DE and EMLI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
SYBK.DE
EMLI.L
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) (SYBK.DE) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYBK.DE | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.96 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 6.38 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYBK.DE | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.97 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.45 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.31 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.34 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYBK.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, roughly equal to the maximum EMLI.L drawdown of -19.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBK.DE and EMLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYBK.DE | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -19.29% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -3.33% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -8.34% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.84% | -10.78% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.71% | -17.49% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -1.15% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -5.65% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 1.02% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) (SYBK.DE) is 1.31%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that SYBK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYBK.DE | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.79% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 5.53% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 6.69% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 9.49% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 9.76% | -1.32% |
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYBK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLI.L's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYBK.DE vs. EMLI.L - Dividend Comparison
SYBK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than EMLI.L's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 6.55% | 5.81% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 5.21% | 4.50% | 3.68% | 5.24% | 5.83% | 5.76% | 6.69% | 7.09% |
SYBK.DE SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) | 7.17% | 7.68% | 6.96% | 6.73% | 5.79% | 5.11% | 6.01% | 5.54% | 5.04% | 6.51% | 5.30% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYBK.DE and EMLI.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SYBK.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYBK.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.
SYBK.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EMLI.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. SYBK.DE tracks Bloomberg SASB US Corporate High Yield ESG Ex-Controversies Select, while EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SYBK.DE and 0.61% for EMLI.L.
Find the right allocation for SYBK.DE and EMLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer