PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBF.DE achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than XDGU.DE's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBF.DE has outperformed XDGU.DE with an annualized return of 2.03%, while XDGU.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.77% annualized return.


SYBF.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
1.44%
YTD
2.45%
6M
1.78%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
2.03%

XDGU.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
1.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.45%-6.53%10.76%1.27%3.69%7.97%-6.46%6.72%6.12%-11.31%
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
0.98%-4.06%6.36%5.11%-12.82%5.84%0.25%20.55%-0.32%-6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2015

0.57

The correlation between SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBF.DE
SYBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XDGU.DE
XDGU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBF.DEXDGU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.09

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.78

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

1.97

-0.14

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBF.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.06

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.18

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.21

+0.20

Drawdowns

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.13%, smaller than the maximum XDGU.DE drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBF.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.13%

-19.37%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-3.83%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

-12.28%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.75%

-16.96%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.13%

-19.37%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-7.05%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-6.65%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.53%

-0.11%

Volatility

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) is 1.03%, while Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that SYBF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDGU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBF.DEXDGU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.35%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

4.31%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

6.16%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

9.24%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.33%

10.24%

-2.91%

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBF.DE vs. XDGU.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than XDGU.DE's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.59%4.66%3.52%2.64%1.03%1.48%2.43%2.07%1.43%1.51%1.16%0.87%
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
4.07%4.30%5.04%3.85%3.89%4.75%3.58%2.64%2.25%3.30%0.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SYBF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate 0-3, while XDGU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBF.DE and XDGU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer